Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging based target delineation in radiotherapy planning of central nervous system tumors ( High grade gliomas).

Authors

  • karuna singh BFUHS Author
  • NIHARIKA MITTAL BFUHS Author
  • pardeep sharma BFUHS Author
  • sheetal sachdeva Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/8wfm0219

Abstract

Aim of study : The study was designed to assess and analyze the difference in tumor volumes depicted on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance  (MRI) and their effect on the treatment planning.

Materials and methods: twenty -five patients with high grade glioma who had underwent surgical resection and reffered for radiation treatment were taken in the study. CT and MRI imaging were done for all the patients with 1.25 mm thickness. the CT and MRI tumor volumes were delineated and comparision was done between them.

Results: The mean and median of GTV on CT scan were 70.82 and 65.65 respectively. The mean and median of GTV on MRI were 91.11 and 76.54 respectively. A linear relationship between CT and MRI volumes with correaltion coefficient of r=0.93 and MRI shows 1.19 times more volume when comparedwith CT volumes.

Conclusion : The study shows that MRI is an important modality to delineate the brain tumor to avoid the geographical miss and under dosage of the tumor.

key words: high grade glioma, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • karuna singh, BFUHS

    ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR radiation oncologist

  • NIHARIKA MITTAL, BFUHS

    clinician radiation oncologist

  • pardeep sharma, BFUHS

    medical physicist

  • sheetal sachdeva

    medical physicist

References

Kent DL, Haynor DR, Longstreth WT, Larson EB. The clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in neuroimaging. Ann Intern Med . 1994; 15;120:856-71.

Thornton A.F, Sandler HM, Ten Haken RK, etal. The clinical utility of MRI in 3 -dimensional treatment planning of brain neoplasms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy 1992; 24:767-75.

Nelson SJ. Multivoxel resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 2003; 2(5) : 497-507.

Websy G, Adamis MK, Edelmann RR. Artifacts in MRI : Description , causes and solutions . In: Edelmann RR, Hessselink JK, Zlatkin MB, editors. Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Saunders: Philadelphia, Pa; 1996.p.88-144.

Khoo VS, Dearnaley DP,Finnigan DJ, Padhani A, Tanner SF, Leach MO. Magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) : Considerations and applications in radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiother Oncol 1997; 42:1-15.

Ten Haken RK, Thornton AF Jr, Sandler HM, LaVigne ML. Quint DJ. Fraass BA, etal. A quantitative assessment of the addition of MRI to CT based , 3 D Treatment planning of brain tumors. Radiother Oncol 1992;25:121-33.

Prabhakar R, Haresh KP, Ganesh T, Joshi RC, Julka PK, Rath GK. Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance based target volume in brain tumors. J Cancer Res Ther.2007; volume 3, 121-23.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2025

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES ~ Radio diagnosis

How to Cite

Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging based target delineation in radiotherapy planning of central nervous system tumors ( High grade gliomas). (2025). International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research, 11(2), RD1-RD3. https://doi.org/10.21276/8wfm0219