Correlation of Basal Marker Expression in Triple Negative and Non-Triple Negative Breast Carcinomas

  • Pawan Trivedi Associate Professor, Pathology, MIMS Barabanki, UP, India
  • Priyanka Singh Associate Professor, Pathology, MIMS Barabanki, UP, India
  • Santosh Kumar Jain Cosultant, Jain Nursing Home Barabanki UP, India
Keywords: Breast carcinoma, Triple negative, Basal Markers.

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a multifaceted disease comprising of distinct biological subtypes and various molecular features with different prognostic and therapeutic implications. Breast cancers with ER/PR negative, HER2 negative phenotype are classified as triple negative tumours and have poor prognosis and therapy response. Four basal like markers, namely CK5/6, CK14, CK17 and EGFR of which at least two should be positive to be termed as Basal-like breast cancer. Basal-like breast cancers (BLBC) are often called triple negative (TN) breast cancers. Although, a significant overlap was observed between the triple-negative breast cancer and BLBC, triple negativity should not be used as a surrogate marker for the basal-like breast cancers.

The aim of the study is to show the importance of basal markers in diagnosis of triple negative/non triple negative breast cancers.

Materials and Methods: The study was performed for the expression of ER, PR, HER2, CK 5/6 and EGFR by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 48 breast carcinoma patients who underwent for radical mastectomy and cases had triple negative phenotype were correlated with basal markers for any significance.

Results: Out of 48 breast carcinoma cases, 21 were triple negative. 15 (71.4%) TN cases showed basal marker positivity as compared to 62.9% of non-TN cases.

Conclusions: Expression of basal markers was more among the triple negative breast carcinomas. However, not all basal-like cancers lack ER, PR and HER2 expression and conversely not all triple negative cancers show a basal-like expression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Onitilio AA, Engel JM, Grecnlee RT, Mukesh BN. Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival. Clin Med Res. 2009;7(1-2):04-13.
2. Dolled-Filhart M, Rydén L, Cregger M, Jirström K, Harigopal M, Camp RL et al. Classification of breast cancer using genetic algorithms and tissue microarrays. Clinical Cancer Research. 2006;12(21):6459-6468.
3. Adebamowo CA, Famooto A, Ogundiran TO, Aniagwu T, Nkwodimmah C, Akang EE; Immunohistochemical and molecular subtypes of breast cancer in Nigeria. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2008;110(1):183–188.
4. Kutomi G, Ohmura T, Suzuki Y, Kameshima H, Shima H, Takamaru T, Satomi F, Otokozawa S, Mori M, Hirata K. Clinicopathological characteristics of basal type breast cancer in triple-negative breast cancer. Journal of cancer therapy. 2012 Oct 31;3(05):836-40.
5. Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, Geiger B, Krepler R. The Catalog of Human Cytokeratins: Patterns of Expression in Normal Epithelia, Tumors and Caltured Cells. Cell. Nov 1982; 31(1):11-24.
6. Bocker W, Bier B, Freytag G, et al. An Immunihistochemical Study of Breast using Antibodies to Basal and Luminal Keratins, Alpha-smooth Muscle Actin, Vimentin, Collagen IV and Laminin. Part II: Epitheliosis and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1992;421(4):323-30.
7. Nogi H, Kobayashi T, Suzuki M, Tabei I, Kawase K, Toriumi Y, Fukushima H, Uchida K. EGFR as paradoxical predictor of chemosensitivity and outcome among triple-negative breast cancer. Oncology reports. 2009 Feb 1;21(2):413-7.
8. Rao C, Shetty J, Kishan Prasad HL. Immunohistochemical Profile and Morphology in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2013 Jul, 7(7): 1361-1365.
9. Weigelt B, Baehner FL, Reis-Filho JS. The contribution of gene expression profiling to breast cancer classification, prognostication and prediction: a retrospective of the last decade. J Pathol 2010; 220:263–280.
10. Bertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. How Basal are Triple negative Breast Cancer. Int J Cancer. Jul 2008;123:236-40.
11. Flanagan MB, Dabbs DJ, Brufsky AM, Beriwal S, Bhargava R. Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:1255-1261.
12. McCarty KS Jr, Miller LS, Cox EB, Konrath J, McCarty KS Sr. Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1985; 109: 716-721.
13. Choccalingam C, Rao L, Rao S. Clinico-pathological characteristics of triple negative and non-triple negative high grade breast carcinomas with and without basal marker (CK5/6 and EGFR) expression at a rural tertiary hospital in India. Breast cancer (Auckl). 2012;6:21-9.
14. Bhargava R, Beriwal S, David J. Dabbs, Ozbek U, Soran A, Ronald R. Johnson, Adam M. Brufsky, Barry C. Lembersky, and Gretchen M. Ahrendt. Immunohistochemical Surrogate Markers of Breast Cancer Molecular Classes Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single Institutional Experience With 359 Cases. Wiley InterScience 2010;116(6):1431-1439
Published
2021-10-09
How to Cite
1.
Trivedi P, Singh P, Jain SK. Correlation of Basal Marker Expression in Triple Negative and Non-Triple Negative Breast Carcinomas. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res [Internet]. 2021Oct.9 [cited 2021Oct.23];7(3):PA1-PA4. Available from: https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/756