MRI – A Valuable Tool for the Evaluation of Various Abnormalities in Patients of Knee Pain
Background: Diagnosis in cases of patients suffering from Knee pain has utmost important for treatment and to avoid unnecessary surgery. MRI is a non-invasive procedure in evaluation of knee joint. So this study was planned find out the prevalence of abnormalities detected by MRI in patients of knee pain.
Methods: The present study was conducted in Department of Radio Diagnosis and Orthopaedics at Era’s Lucknow Medical College and Hospital. This prospective study was carried out on n=75 patients of knee pain attending Orthopaedic department of Era’s Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow for a period of six months.
Results: Initially 95 patients were enrolled in our study on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. But out of 95 patients, only 75 patients were completed our study period. Out of 75 patients, 42 patients were males and 33 patients were females. Knee pain was found common in age group 50-60 years age group. Joint effusion (84.6%) were more common followed by Edema (68.8%), Menisci lesions (48.8%) were more common as compared to ligament
lesions (14.8%) in patients of knee pain. Osteoarthritis was found in 66.76 % of patients of knee pain.
Conclusions: Knee pain can occur at any stage of life due to various causative factors. MRI can demonstrate the exact nature and extent of bony as well as soft tissue abnormality. This has increase the use of MRI in evaluation of patients of knee pain.
2. Guermazi A, Burstein D, Conaghan P, Eckstein F, Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau MP, Keen H, et al. Imaging in osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008;34:645e87.
3. Hunter D, Hellio Le Graverand M, Eckstein F. Radiologic markers of osteoarthritis progression. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;21:110-7.
4. Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Hayashi D. Imaging of osteoarthritis: update from a radiological perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23:484-91.
5. Pompan DC. Reassessing the role of MRI in evaluation of knee pain. American Family physician. 2012;85(3):224.
6. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK, Keene GS, Hollingworth W, Lomas DJ, Villar RN. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness. Clin Radiol 1996;51:245–50.
7. Maurer EJ, Kaplan PA, Dussault RG, et al. Acutely injured knee: effect of MR imaging on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions. Radiology1997;204:799–805.
8. Mansour MAM, Ahmed RA, Ibrahim A, Elhussein N, Aljuaid SA. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic procedures for knee joint injures at taif hospital, Saudi Arabia. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2015;4(2):37-46.
9. Nasir A. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the knee joint injuries, international research journal of medical sciences. 2013;1(5):1-7.
10. Yusuf E, Kortekaas MC, Watt I, Huizinga TW, Kloppenburg M. Do knee abnormalities visualised on MRI explain knee pain in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:60-7.
11. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. A prospective and blinded investigation of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: abnormal findings in asymptomatic subjects. Clin Orthop. 1992;282:177–85.
12. Nikolaou VS, Chronopoulos E, Savvidou C et al. MRI efficacy in diagnosing internal lesions of the knee: a retrospective analysis. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2008;2:4.
13. Khanda GE, Akhtar W, Ahsan H, Ahmad N. Assessment of menisci and ligamentous injuries of the knee on magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with arthroscopy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58:537–40.
14. Stoller DW, Martin C, Crues JV 3rd, Kaplan L, Mink JH. Menisci tears: pathologic correlation with MR imaging. Radiology 1987;163(3):731-5.
15. Mackenzie R, Palmer CR, Lomas DJ, Dixon AK. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: diagnostic performance studies. Clin Radiol 1996;51:251–7.
16. Litwic A, Edwards M, Dennison E, Cooper C. Epidemiology and Burden of Osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull. 2013;105:185–99.
17. Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011; 2(2): 205–12.