Evaluation of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BAER) in Parkinson’s Disease

  • Nisar G Ahmed Research Scholar,Department of physiology J.N.M.C., A.M.U., Aligarh, India
  • D K Agrawal Professor, Department of Physiology, J.N.M.C., A.M.U., Aligarh, India
  • Anjum Mirza Chughtai Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, J.N.M.C., A.M.U., Aligarh, India
Keywords: Parkinson disease, Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response and Auditory Pathways


Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive long-term, neurodegenerative disorder of central nervous system which mainly affects the motor system, caused by loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, but also in other dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic areas of the brain and mainly in the brainstem. Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response are routinely used in clinical practice to evaluate the function of the auditory nerve and auditory pathways in the brainstem. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Methods30 subjects (18 males and 12females) with Parkinson’s disease. And same number of healthy age-matched subject control group was assessed. Age of Control Group was 61.2±11.6 & of Test Group 61.7±10.4. A complete & detailed neurological examination (CNS) were performed in all individuals clinically especially of motor system to evaluate the severity of the disease for the occurrence of Parkinson’s disease. Recordings of BAERs were performed with Neurostim Plus software of Medicaid Company, using 70 dB HL in the form of rarefaction clicks were used in each ear obtain good quality BAER recording.

Results. The BAER results were interpreted for the latencies and Interpeak latencies. The result of this study shows that the waves II, III, IV, V and IPL III-V were significantly delayed.

Conclusion. Parkinson’s disease population showed significant differences to Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response


Download data is not yet available.


1. Etienne C. Hirsch, Peter Jenner, Serge Przedborski – Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease – Movement Disorders, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2013.
2. Pringsheim T., Jette N., Frolkis A. et al. (2014) The prevalence of Parkinson’ s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov. Disorder. 29, 1583–1590.
3. An essay on the shaking palsy. 1817 J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002 Spring; 14(2):223 36; discussion 222.
4. Calne DB, Snow BJ, Lee C et al. Criteria for diagnosing Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1992; (suppl 32): S125- S127
5. David Sulzer, James Surmeier – Neuronal Vulnerability, Pathogenesis, and Parkinson’s Disease – Movement Disorders, Vol. 28, No.1, 2013.
6. Etienne C. Hirsch, Peter Jenner, Serge Przedborski – Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease – Movement Disorders, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2013.
7. In: Fauci AS et al. (Eds). Parkinson's disease and other extrapyra-midal disorders. Amino. MJ. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
8. Nihal Sinha,Sanjay Manohar,Masud Husain Impulsivity and apathy in Parkinson's disease Journal of NeuropsychologyVolume 7, Issue September 2013 Pages 255–283.
9. Gelb DJ, Oliver E, Gilman S. Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol (1999) 56:33?9.
10. Litvan I, Bhatia KP, Burn DJ, Goetz CG, Lang AE, McKeith I, et al. Movement Disorders Society Scientific Issues Committee. Movement Disorders Society Scientific Issues Committee report: SIC Task Force appraisal of clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinsonian disorders. Mov Disord (2003) 18:467?86.
11. Schneider JS, Diamond SG, Markham CH. Parkinson's disease: sensory and motor problems in arms and hands. Neurology (1987) 37:951-6.
12. Morris ME. Movement disorders in people with Parkinson disease: a model for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2000;80:578–597.
13. Hye Mi Lee, Seong-Beom Koh. Many Faces of Parkinson’s Disease: Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease: J Mov Disord 2015;8(2):92-97.
14. Shulman LM, Taback RL, Bean J, Weiner WJ. Comorbidity of the non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2001; 16:507–510.
15. Andrade LAF, Barbosa ER, Cardoso F, Teive HAG. Parkinson’s Disease: current treatment stratergies . São Paulo: Lemos Editorial; 1999.
16. Yamasoba, T., et al., Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: Epidemiology and mechanistic pathways, Hearing Research 2013: 1-9.
17. Bernard Biacabe, Jean Marc Chevallier, Paul Avan, Pierre Bonfi ls – Functional anatomy of auditory brainstem nuclei: application to the anatomical basis of brainstem auditory evoked potentials, Auris Nasus Larynx 28 (2001) 85–94.
18. Carmine Vitale, Vincenzo Marcelli, Roberto Allocca – Hearing Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease: Expanding the Nonmotor Phenotype, Movement Disorders, Vol. 27, No. 12, 2012
19. M.J. Gawel, P. Das, S. Vincent, F. Clifford Rose – Visual and auditory evoked responses in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1981, 44, 227-232.
20. Süleyman Yýlmaz, Elif Karalý, Abdurrahman Tokmak, et all – Auditoryin Parkinsonian patients, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2009) 266:669–671.
21. Fradis M, Samet A, Ben-David J, et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials to different stimulus rates in parkinsonian patients. Eur Neurol 1988;28:181–186
22. Daniel Alexa, Laura Alexa, Livia Popa, Dan Nicolae Paduraru. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in parkinson’s
disease. Romanian journal of neurology 2013;Volume 12: No. 4.
23. Prasher D, Bannister R. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple system atrophy with progressive autonomic failure (Shy Drager syndrome). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1986;49:278–289.
24. Akil CM, Weber SN, Park SN, Ninkina N, Buchman V, Lustig LR. Localization of synucleins in the mammalian cochlea. J Assoc Res Otoloaryngol 2008;9:452–463.
25. Spicer SS, Schulte BA. Pathologic changes of presbycusis begin in secondary processes and spread to primary processes of strial marginal cells. Hear Res 2005;205:225–240.
26. Carpenter M. Core Text of Neuroanatomy. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1985:137–149.
27. Yeterian EH, Pandya DN. Corticostriatal connections of the superior temporal region in rhesus monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1998;399: 384–402.
28. Selemon LD, Goldman-Rakic PS. Longitudinal topography and interdigitation of corticostriatal projections in the rhesus monkey. J Neurosci 1985;5:776–794.
29. Shammah-Lagnado SJ, Alheid GF, Heimer L. Efferent connections of the caudal part of the globus pallidus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1996;376:489–507.
30. Kurt A. Jellinger – Neuropathology of Sporadic Parkinson’s Disease- Evaluation and Changes of Concepts, Movement Disorders, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2012
31. R. Adalbert, M. P. Coleman – Axon pathology in age-related neurodegenerative disorders, Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 39, 90–108 (2013)
How to Cite
Ahmed NG, Agrawal DK, Chughtai AM. Evaluation of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BAER) in Parkinson’s Disease. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res [Internet]. 2017Sep.23 [cited 2020May31];3(3):90-4. Available from: https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/64