An Analytical Study on Prevalence of Knee joint abnormalities assessed by MRI- A Hospital Based Study

  • Lalit Bhandari Associate Professor, Department of Radio diagnosis, AIMS & RC, Rajsamand.
  • Rahul Mangal Assistant Professor, Department of Radio diagnosis, AIMS & RC, Rajsamand.
Keywords: MRI, Knee pain, Menisci, Osteoarthritis

Abstract

Background: In order to treat the patients suffering from knee joint ailments, diagnosis has plays an essential role for treatment and to avoid unnecessary surgery. MRI is a non-invasive procedure in evaluation of knee joint. So this study was planned find out the prevalence of abnormalities detected by MRI in patients of knee pain.

Methods: This prospective study was carried out on n= 62 patients of knee pain. Patients were examined after taking permission from institutional ethics committee by using Siemens Avanto MR Machine with a superconducting magnet and field strength of 1.5 tesla using dedicated knee coil (Flex), which were referred from department of Orthopaedics.

Results: In this present study 41 patients were males and 21 patients females and their ages ranging from (20-65) years. Knee pain was found common in age group 46-60 years age group. Joint effusion n=50 were more common followed by Edema n=40, Menisci lesions n=33 were more common as compared to ligament lesions n=7 in patients of knee pain. Osteoarthritis was found in 54.6 % of patients of knee pain.

Conclusion: Knee pain can occur at any stage of life due to various causative factors. MRI can demonstrate the exact nature and extent of bony as well as soft tissue abnormality. This has increase the use of MRI in evaluation of patients of knee pain.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rahul Mangal, Assistant Professor, Department of Radio diagnosis, AIMS & RC, Rajsamand.

 

 

References

1. Yadav R, Kachewar SG. Role of MRI in evaluation of painful knee. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2014;3(1):84-7.
2. Guermazi A, Burstein D, Conaghan P, Eckstein F, Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau MP, Keen H, et al. Imaging in osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008;34:645e87.
3. Hunter D, Hellio Le Graverand M, Eckstein F. Radiologic markers of osteoarthritis progression. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;21:110-7.
4. Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Hayashi D. Imaging of osteoarthritis: update from a radiological perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23:484-91.
5. Pompan DC. Reassessing the role of MRI in evaluation of knee pain. American Family physician. 2012;85(3):224.
6. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK, Keene GS, Hollingworth W, Lomas DJ, Villar RN. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness. Clin Radiol 1996;51:245–50.
7. Maurer EJ, Kaplan PA, Dussault RG, et al. Acutely injured knee: effect of MR imaging on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions. Radiology1997;204:799–805.
8. Mansour MAM, Ahmed RA, Ibrahim A, Elhussein N, Aljuaid SA. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic procedures for knee joint injures at taif hospital, Saudi Arabia. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2015;4(2):37-46.
9. Nasir A. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the knee joint injuries, international research journal of medical sciences. 2013;1(5):1-7.
10. Yusuf E, Kortekaas MC, Watt I, Huizinga TW, Kloppenburg M. Do knee abnormalities visualised on MRI explain knee pain in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:60-7.
11. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. A prospective and blinded investigation of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: abnormal findings in asymptomatic subjects. Clin Orthop. 1992;282:177–85.
12. Nikolaou VS, Chronopoulos E, Savvidou C et al. MRI efficacy in diagnosing internal lesions of the knee: a retrospective analysis. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2008;2:4.
13. Khanda GE, Akhtar W, Ahsan H, Ahmad N. Assessment of menisci and ligamentous injuries of the knee on magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with arthroscopy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58:537–40.
14. Stoller DW, Martin C, Crues JV 3rd, Kaplan L, Mink JH. Menisci tears: pathologic correlation with MR imaging. Radiology 1987;163(3):731-5.
15. Mackenzie R, Palmer CR, Lomas DJ, Dixon AK. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: diagnostic performance studies. Clin Radiol 1996;51:251–7.
16. Litwic A, Edwards M, Dennison E, Cooper C. Epidemiology and Burden of Osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull. 2013;105:185–99.
17. Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011; 2(2): 205–12.
18. Kachewar SG, Kulkarni DS. Distant perijoint calcifications: sequel of non-traumatic brain injury-a review and case report. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2013;7:2606-9.
19. Kachewar SG, Singh H. Perigenicular Heterotopic Ossification: A rare sequelae of non-traumatic brain injury. Nepal Journal of Neurosciences. 2010;1:21-3.
Published
2019-03-21
How to Cite
1.
Bhandari L, Mangal R. An Analytical Study on Prevalence of Knee joint abnormalities assessed by MRI- A Hospital Based Study. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res [Internet]. 2019Mar.21 [cited 2022Aug.9];5(1):61-3. Available from: https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/582
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLES ~ Radio diagnosis