Bacteriological Study of Post-Operative Wound Infections in IPD of Surgery in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

  • Mohan Lal Vishnoi Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, AIMS & RC, Udaipur.
  • Manish . Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, AIMS & RC, Udaipur.
Keywords: Post –operative wound, Contaminated wound, Organism


Background: The postoperative wound infection varies from 1 to 9 percent, depending on the surgical procedure. Due to postoperative wound infection, the length of stay in hospital increases. It also increases the cost of the procedure and is associated with significant morbidity. Staphylococcus aureus is the causative agent in 15 to 20% of these infections, though the pathogen isolated differs according to the surgical site.

Methods: The population of study was 200. Among 200 cases 29 cases got bacterial infection. This study was conducted in Department of surgery and the patients were recruited on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results: In this study we were included total 200 cases. We found that 78 cases of clean wound followed by clean contaminated 54, contaminated 38 & 30dirty wound. Prevalence of infection was 14.5%.

Conclusion: Post-operative wound infections are a serious medical problem that has to be tackled due to its increased morbidity, mortality and medical care costs. An active surveillance program is recommended.



Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Manish ., Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, AIMS & RC, Udaipur.




1. WHO. Surveillance, control and prevention of hospital acquired (nosocomial) infections. Report of an advisory group. 1981 BAC/NIC/81.6.
2. Bock Avalos S. Knocking out nosocomial infections. Nursing 2010 June 24. URL: articles/mi_qa3689/is_200411/ai_n9471334/. AccessedAugust 15, 2013.
3. Voiglio EJ. 14th European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013;39(1):S1-62.
4. Perl TM, Roy MC. Postoperative wound infections: risk factors and role of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. J chemoth. 1995;7:29-35.
5. Sleet DA, Gielen AC. Injury as a public health problem. Health promotion in practice. 1991:361.
6. Uçkay I, Harbarth S, Peter R, Lew D, Hoffmeyer P, Pittet D. Preventing surgical site infections. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2010;8(6):657-70.
7. Prabhakar H, Arora S (1979) A bacteriological study of wound infections. J Indian Med Assoc 73: 145-148.
8. Agrawal PK, Agrawal M, Bal A, Gahlaut YVS (1984) Incidence of Postoperative wound infection at Aligarh. Indian J Surg 46: 326-333.
9. Kowli SS, Naik MH, Mehta AP, Bhalerao RA (1985) Hospital Infection. Ind J Surg 47: 475.
10. Anvikar AR, Deshmukh AB, Karyakarte RP, Damle AS, Patwardhan NS, et al. (1999) A one year prospective study of 3280 surgical wounds. Ind J Med Microbiol 17: 129-132.
11. Murthy R, Sengupta S, Maya N, Shivananda PG (1998) Incidence of postoperative wound infection and their antibiogram in a teaching and referral hospital. Indian J Med Sci 52: 553-555.
12. Tripathy S, Roy N (1984) Post-operative wound sepsis. Indian J Surg 46: 285-288.
13. Yalçin AN, Bakir M, Bakici Z, Dökmetas I, Sabir N (1995) Postoperative wound infections. J Hosp Infect 29: 305-309.
14. Khan MA, Ansari MN, Bana S (1985) Post-operative wound infection. Indian J Surg 47: 383.
15. Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, et al. (2004) Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 239:599-605.
16. Catanzarite T, Saha S, Pilecki MA, Kim JY, Milad MP (2015) Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22: 1049-1058.
17. Prokopovich P, Leech R, Carmalt CJ, Parkin IP, Perni S (2013) A novel bone cement impregnated with silver-tiopronin nanoparticles: its antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and mechanical properties. Int J Nanomedicine 8: 2227-2237.
18. Martov A, Gravas S, Etemadian M, Unsal A, Barusso G, et al. (2015) Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Study Group. Postoperative infection rates in patients with a negative baseline urine culture undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal: a matched case-control analysis on antibiotic prophylaxis from the CROES URS global study. J Endourol 29: 171-180.
19. George AK, Srinivasan AK, Cho J, Sadek MA, Kavoussi LR (2011) Surgical site infection rates following laparoscopic urological procedures.J Urol 185: 1289-1293.
How to Cite
Vishnoi ML, . M. Bacteriological Study of Post-Operative Wound Infections in IPD of Surgery in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res [Internet]. 2017Mar.18 [cited 2023Sep.25];3(1):95-8. Available from: