Various Modalities for Fixation of Fracture Supracondylar Humerus in Pediatric Age Group

  • Vishal Shinde Assistant Professor, Orthopedics Pacific Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
Keywords: Supracondylar Fractures, Humerus

Abstract

Background: The objective of the present study is to analyze & compare various modalities available for management of fracture supracondylar humerus in pediatric population.

Methods: The present prospective study was conducted in the department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology  Ananta institute of medical sciences and research centre, Rajsamand from December 2015 to April 2018.

Results: In our study we found that in Grade II and III supracondylar fracture of humerus in children closed reduction is difficult  to achieve and is complicated by  slippage  of reduction leading to fixation with k-wires in early presentation or malunion  deformity in cases of late presentation and vascular comprise if excessive flexion is done to hold reduction. While Grade I fracture can effectively be managed with closed reduction & cast with caution of maintaining reduction.

Conclusions: In this study we found that results of displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus presenting can be effectively best treated by closed reduction with percutaneous pinning because patients who were treated conservatively developed deformities more than closed reduction and internal fixation group. Patients with cross k-wire fixation from either condyle has better outcome as compared to lateral entry cross k-wire fixation.     

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Flynn JC, Matthews JG: Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children. JBJS (Am) 1974;56:263-273.
2. McLaughlin HL, (1961) trauma pp215. Ed Interamericana S.A., Mexico 1961
3. Gartland JJ. Management of supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. Surg Gyneco Obstet 1959; 145-154.
4. Charnley J: Closed treatment of common fractures, 3 rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1961: 105 – 115.
5. Alcott WH, Bowden BW, Miller PR: Displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus in the children: Long term follow up of 69 patients. J Am Osteopath assoc 1977,76:910-915.
6. Alburger PD,Weidner PL : Supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 1992 Jan 12(1) 16-19.
7. Abraham E,Powers T Witt et al : Experimental hyperextension in supracondylar fractures in monkeys .Clin Orthopedic 171:309-318,1982.
8. Kumar R, Malhotra R, Kiran EK: Medial approach for operative treatment of the widely displaced supracondylar fracture of the children, J of orthopedic surgery (Hongkong) 2000 Dec.: 8(7) 13-18.
9. Boyd DW, Aronson DD: Supracondylar fracture of the humerus : a prospective study of percutaneous pinning,Journal of pediatric orthopedics 1992;12.789-794.
10. Cheng JC,Lam TP, Maffulli N; Epidemiogical features of supracondylar fracture of the humerusin Chinese children, Journal of pediatric orthopedics,part B .10(1) : 63-7,2001 january.
11. Archibald DA, Roberts JA, Smith MGH:Transarticular fixation for severely displaced supracondylar fractures in children, JBJS(Br) 1991;73:147-149.
12. Fowles JV, Kassab MT: Displaced supracondylar fractures of the elbow in children, JBJS (Br) 1974;56:490-500.
Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
1.
Shinde V. Various Modalities for Fixation of Fracture Supracondylar Humerus in Pediatric Age Group. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res [Internet]. 2019Sep.30 [cited 2019Dec.13];5(3):15-7. Available from: https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/489
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLES ~ Orthopaedics