Efficacy of Ketamine and Fentanyl Vs. Intrathecal Bupivacaine Post-operatively in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Study

  • Sunita Sharma Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur, India
  • Navya Mishra PG Student, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur, India
Keywords: Ketamine, Fentanyl, Hysterectomy

Abstract

Background: Although disturbing emergence reactions are associated with its use, ketamine has several clinically useful properties, including analgesia and less cardiorespiratory depressant effects than other anaesthetic agents, in fact it causes some stimulation of the cardiovascular system. Methods: Two group were included in this study i.e. Group A & Group B. Both group had 18 cases. This study conducted in Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital.

Results: Demographic variables were compared between both groups A and B. Group A is A significant faster onset of sensory block was found in ketamine group in comparison to fentanyl group. (p-value<0.001). While the time to achieve the highest level of sensory block was found to be almost similar in both the groups.

Conclusion: Addition of ketamine or fentanyl to spinal bupivacaine were equally effective in pain control after abdominal hysterectomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Hirota K,Lambert DG. Ketamine: its mechanism of action and unusual clinical uses. British journal of Anaesthesia. 1996;77:441-4.
2. lavand'hoMMe P, de KoCK M, waTerloos h: intraoperative epidural analgesia combined with ketamine provides effective preventive analgesia in patients undergoing major digestive surgery. Anesthesiology; 2005,103:813-20.
3. Ashok Shankar Bhade, Mahesh Nagappa. Comparison of intrathecal “Fentanyl + bupivacaine” and “ketamine + bupivacaine” for spinal anaesthesia-Randomized prospective double-blind study. Priory medical journal, UK 2008.
4. UnlugenC h, ozalevli M, gunes y, olguner s, evrüKe C, ozCengiz d, eT al: A double-blind comparison of intrathecal S (+) ketamine and fentanyl combined with bupivacaine 0.5% for caesarean delivery. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006, 23:1018-24.
5. Yanni Y, Eren A: The effect of extradural ketamine on onset time and sensory block in extradural anaesthesia with bupivacaine. Anaesthesia; 1996, 51:84-6.
6. Kathirvel S, Sadhasivam S, Saxena A, Kannan TR, and Ganjoop: Effects of Intrathecal Ketamine added to Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia. Anesthesia 2000; 899:904 .
7. Lida H, Dohi S, Tanahashi T, Wtanabe Y, Takenaka M: Spinal Conduction Block by Intrathecal Ketamine in Dogs. Anesthesia Analgesia 1997; 85:106 – 10.
8. KaMal MM, el-fawy d: The effect of adding ketamine to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in day-case surgery. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol; 2014, 7:530-3.
9. Shrestha SN, BhaT Tarai B, Shah R: Comparative study of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus ketamine vs bupivacaine plus fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia during ceserean section. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2013 Oct-Dec, 11(44):287-91.
10. Galindo A: pH-Adjusted local anesthetics: clinical experience. Reg Anaesth; 1983, :35- 6.
11. Togal T, Demirbilek S, Koroglu A. Effects of S (+) ketamine added to bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for prostrate surgery in elderly patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:193-197
12. Murali Krishna T, Panda nB, BaTra yK, rajeev s: Combination of low doses of intrathecal ketamine and midazolam with bupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia in orthopaedic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008, 25:299-306.
13. Bion JF: Intrathecal ketamine for war surgery. A preliminary review. Anaesthesia; 1984, 39:1023-8
Published
2018-12-29
How to Cite
1.
Sharma S, Mishra N. Efficacy of Ketamine and Fentanyl Vs. Intrathecal Bupivacaine Post-operatively in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Study. IABCR [Internet]. 29Dec.2018 [cited 23Jan.2019];4(4):51-3. Available from: https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/440