Evaluation of Efficacy of Various Techniques of Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study

  • Rita Verma Senior Specialist (General Surgery), Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Bhilwara, Rajasthan, India
  • Vinod Kumar Jeengar
Keywords: Open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, acute cholecystitis


Background: Open cholecystectomy has been the treatment of choice for more than a century since its introduction and the procedure is standardized among surgeons. Encouraged by the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which has become the gold-standard treatment for gallstone disease in a short span of time, laparoscopic surgery has gained in popularity and found application in almost every surgical specialty. Aim of the study: To compare laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy with acute cholecystitis. Materials & Methods: The present study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery of Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Bhilwara, Rajasthan, India. . For the study, we retrospectively viewed the medical records of patients aged 30-65 years with acute cholecystitis who underwent Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and were compared patients who underwent open cholecystectomy (OC). A total of 44 (22 each for LC and OC) were selected. The analysis of preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative parameters was done and was compared. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in the study. The surgical procedure for LC and OC were performed by experienced surgeons. The Male/Female ratio in LC and OC group was 14/8 and 12/10 respectively. The mean age of patients in LC group was 42.1+4.8 years and in OC group was 44.5+4.2 years. The mean body weight of LC and OC group was 60.2+9.3 kg and 58.6+8.3 kg respectively. The mean operative time period for LC was 66.8 minutes and for OC was 91.2 minutes. Blood loss more than 500 mL was seen in 2 patients for LC and 4 patients for OC. The nasogastric tube was employed in 8 patients in LC and 12 patients in OC. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safer procedure in comparison to open cholecystectomy. The postoperative stay at hospital was shorter with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, Zargar SA, Javid G, Sapru S (1989) Prevalence of biliary tract disease in India: a sonographic study in adult population in Kashmir. Gut 30: 201-205.
2. Ellis H (2009) John Stough Bobbs: father of gall bladder surgery. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 70: 650.
3. Traverso LW (1976) Carl Langenbuch and the first cholecystectomy. [Internet]. American journal of surgery p 81-82.
4. Paulino-Netto A (1993) A review of 391 selected open cholecystectomies for comparison with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 166: 71-73.
5. Cheslyn-Curtis S, Russell RC (1991) New trends in gallstone management. Br J Surg 78: 143-149.
6. Villanova N, Bazzoli F, Taroni F, Frabboni R, Mazzella G, et al. (1989) Gallstone recurrence after successful oral bile acid treatment. A 12-year follow-up study and evaluation of long-term post dissolution treatment. Gastroenterology 97: 726–731.
7. Della Bianca P, Bonvin B (1990) [Lithotripsy of biliary calculi by shock waves. Current possibilities and perspectives]. Helv Chir Acta 56: 913-916.
8. Fromm H (1989) Gallstone dissolution therapy with ursodiol. Patient selection. Dig Dis Sci 34: 36S-38S.
9. Karim T, Kadyal A. A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic vs. Open Cholecystectomy in a Suburban Teaching Hospital. J Gastrointest Dig Syst 5:371. doi:10.4172/2161-069X.1000371.
10. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in elderly patients. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2014;20(46):17626-17634. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17626.
11. Yang TF, Guo L, Wang Q. Evaluation of Preoperative Risk Factor for Converting Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jun;61(132):958-65.
12. Lujan JA, Sanchez-Bueno F, Parrilla P, Robles R, Torralba JA, Gonzalez-Costea R. Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Jun;8(3):208-10.
How to Cite
Verma R, Jeengar VK. Evaluation of Efficacy of Various Techniques of Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res [Internet]. 2018Jun.29 [cited 2021Jun.16];4(2):2-. Available from: https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/322