Outcome of Close Diaphyseal Fracture of Both Bones Forearm in Adult Treated by Well Fitting Intramedullary (Square) Nail & Dynamic Compression Plate: A Comparative study
Background: The achievement and maintenance of reduction of diaphyseal fractures of forearm are hindered by deforming muscular forces. The aim of this study to compare the results of close diaphyseal fracture of both bones forearm in adult treated by well-fitting intramedullary (square) nail & dynamic compression plate. Material & Methods: The present study comprised of 60 patients with close fracture both bones forearm belonging to either sex of adult age group, treated in the department of orthopedics, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. All 60 cases included in this study underwent clinical and radiological examination at the time of admission; and type, site, displacement, rotation and angulation of fractures were determined. At follow up examination interval between injury & this examination was recorded & than clinical & radiological examination were carried out. Results: The present study showed that the mean age of patients was 35 yrs, male to female ratio was 3.6:1 and right side were more common as compared to left side, mostly patients had indirect injuries (55%). comparison of functional end result between Hadden et al4 different modalities of treatment and of our present study. Results of plating is comparable with Hadden et al4 sereis but Nailing is inferior. Conclusion: We concluded that functional end results to be excellent to good, plating is the best mode of treatment for fracture forearm bones as 83% excellent to good results had achieved but nailing also have comparable results as achievement of 76% excellent to good results.
Lung 12th & 13th edition Vienn, 1954 cited by Merck. (1961).
Bohler: The treatment of fractures Ed. 5th, Grune and Stratton,
New York, 1956.
2. Burwell, H.N. and Charnley A.D.: Treatment of forearm
fractures in adults with particular reference to plate fixation.
J.B.J.S. 46-b, 404-425, 1964.
3. Charnely. J. (1957). Close treatment of common fracture 2nd
Ed., Edinburgh, London, E & S Livingstone Ltd.
4. Hadden, W.A., Reschauer, R. and Seggl, W. (1983). Results of
A.O. plate Fixation of forearm shaft fractures in adults. Injury
5. Dodge, H.S, and Cady, G.W. (1942). Treatment of fracture of
radius and ulna with compression plates. J.B.J.S., 54-A: 1167-
6. Aderson, L.D; Sisk, T.D. Tomms, R.E. and Park,III (1975).
Compression plate fixation in acute diaphyseal fractures of the
radius and ulna. J.B.J.S. 57-A:287.
7. Marek F.M.: Axial fixation of forearm fracture=_. J.B.J.S. 43-A,
8. Grace, T.C. and Evermann W.W. (1980) Forearm fractures:
Treatment 6y rigid fixation with early motion. J.B.J.S. 62-A. no
9. Lindvall em,sagi hc 2006: Selective screw placement in forearm
compression plating. J ortho trauma march 2006; 20(3),15.
10. Visna P, Valcha M,Vicek M (2009): Management of diaphyseal
fracture forearm using intramedullary nail and plate
osteosynthesis. Rozhl chir 2009 dec 88 (12);708-13.
11. Sang Ki Lee, Kap Jung Kim, Jae Won Lee. 2013: osteosynthesis
versus intramedullary nailing for both bone forarm fracture
.European Journal of ortho surg traumatology; May 2013.
Copyright (c) 2017 International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.