A Clinical Study on Labour Analgesia in Full Term Primigravida Patients

  • Rehana Najam Professor Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, TMU, Moradabad, U.P, India
  • Shubhra Agarwal Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, TMU, Moradabad, U.P, India
Keywords: Epidural Analgesia, programmed labour, traditional labour

Abstract

Background: Labour is defined as the progressive dilatation of cervix with co-ordinate uterine contractions that effect in and expulsion of the products of conception. Experience has shown that providing pain relief to the mother allays fear, anxiety and provides a more favourable environment for improved obstetric outcome.

Aims and Objectives: To compare the effects of programmed labour protocol with epidural analgesia and traditional method of labour.

Materials & Methods: This study is a prospective, randomized controlled study conducted in the department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre Moradabad. 90 pregnant women in active labour were enrolled in the study. They were  allocated to three groups after randomization . Group-A- 30 pregnant women received epidural analgesia. Group-B - 30 pregnant women received programmed labour protocol. Group-C- 30 pregnant women with traditional labour management.

Results: There was excellent relief of pain in group A patient compared to other methods with shortening of duration of labour.

Conclusion: Labour analgesia is a simple, effective method for painless and safe delivery and thus can reduce the number of caesarean section

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. F. Gary Cunningham, Kenneth J. Leveno, Steven L. Bloom et al, Williams —Obstetrics, 23rd Edition, New York, Mc Graw Hill, 454, 2010.
2. Raffin R.B., Friderichs E., Reiman W. — Obstetric analgesics and anesthetics . J Pharmacol Experimental Therapeutics. 260:275-285, 1992.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia Practice Bulletin. b 36, Jul 2002.
4. 4.Ganla KN, Deshmukh S, Bhide A, et al. Intermittent IV bolus ketamine in labor analgesia. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2000;50:60.
5. Guseck E. Conservative acceleration of parturition by avacan Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift 1952;32: 882.
6. Etterich M, Mall M, Haefeli. The effect of spasmolytic agents on parturition. Gynecologia 1959;147:512.
7. Khosla A, Bala J, Dahiya K, Sangwan K. A comparative study of the efficacy of valethamate bromide and Drotaverine in normal labor. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2003;53:568.
8. Mishra SL, Toshniwal A, Banerjee R. Effect of Drotaverine HCl on cervical dilatation in labor, a comparison with Valethamate bromide. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2002;52:76.
9. Mukhopadye AK, Ghosh S, Roy B, et al. Effect of epidosine forte on cervical dilatation in labor. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2000;50:45.
10. Veronica Irene Yuel, Vaneet Kaur, Dilpreet Kaur. — Promrammed labour for optimizing labour and delivery. J K Science. 10 (2):62-64, Apr - Jun 2008.
11. Meena Jyoti, Singhal Prabha, Choudhary Devika. — Programmed labour. J of Obstet Gynecol Ind. 56(1):53-55, 2006.
12. Prasertsawat P.O. Herabutya, Chaturachinda R. — Obstetric analgesia. Current Therapeautic Research. 40: 1022-1028, 1986.
13. Suvonnakote T., Thitadilok W., Atisook R. — Pain relief during labour. J Med Assoc Thiland. 69: 575- 580, 1986
14. Divakar H, Patil A. Programmed Labor–A personal communication
15. Traser WD, Turcot L, Kraws I. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2000; 2:CD000015.
16. Daftary l. Programmed Labour – An Indigenously Developed Protocol of Labour Management. Int J Gynecol Obst Ind 2003 ; 6:47-49
17. Jyoti M, Singhal P, Choudhary D. Programmed Labor. J Obstet Gynecol India 2006 ; 56: 53-55.
Published
2018-03-21
How to Cite
1.
Najam R, Agarwal S. A Clinical Study on Labour Analgesia in Full Term Primigravida Patients. International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research [Internet]. 21Mar.2018 [cited 26Apr.2018];4(1):174-7. Available from: https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/301