Evaluation of Patwardhan Technique in Second Stage Caesarean Section

  • Manju Lal Associate Professor Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Priyanka Goyal Senior Resident,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Saba Shamim MS Scholar, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Keywords: Caesarean sections, Patwardhan technique, NICU

Abstract

Background: Caesarean sections done at full cervical dilatation with impacted fetal head are technically very difficult and are associated with increased incidence of maternal and fetal morbidities. The objective of this study was to compare the maternal and neonatal morbidities between the Patwardhan technique and the Push method for extraction of the fetus in second stage caesarean section. Methods: This is retrospective analysis of all caesarean sections done in the second stage at tertiary care centre at Dehradun, UK, India from 2014 to Dec 2016. Women with single fetus, with anterior vertex, at term with a deeply impacted fetal head into pelvis, in whom decision of caesarean section was already taken, were included in the study. Results: The patients were divided into two groups, Group 1 (study group) consists of all cases in which extraction of fetus was done by Patwardhan technique and group 2 (control) in whom extraction of fetus was done by push method and extracted as vertex. Complications like extension of the incision, injury to surrounding  organs , PPH,  need for blood transfusion and neonatal  outcome  in terms of weight , APGAR  and NICU stay were compared in both groups Out of these 120 cases,56  belonged to group A .( Patwardhan)  and 64 belonged to group B (push method ). Traumatic PPH and blood transfusions were significantly less in Patwardhan as compared to Push method (3%,16%,p=.0049). There were significantly less uterine incision extension seen in Patwardhan group as compared to Push method (5%, 22%, p=.0031).Baby outcome was almost similar in both the groups. While complications are inherent in both the techniques Patwardhan method has been shown to cover considerable advantage in prevention of maternal morbidities. Conclusions: Patwardhan is a useful manoeuvre in intra operative disengagement of fetal head in second stage CS and it should be learnt and practiced as the primary technique. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. The World Health Report, 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count.
2. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 2005.
3. Singh M, Varma R (2008) Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at Cesarean section: a simple instrument. TOG 10:38-41.
4. Benedetti TJ (1999) Birth injury and method of delivery. N Engl J Med 341: 1758-1759.
5. Asicioglu O, Gungorduk K, Yildirim G, Asicioglu BB, Gungorduk OC, et al. (2014) Second-stage vs first-stage caesarean delivery: comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol 34: 598-604.
6. Saha PK, Gulati R, Goel P, Tandon R, Huria A (2014) Second stage caesarean section: evaluation of patwardhan technique. J Clin Diagn Res 8: 93-95.
7. AbouZahr C. Prolonged and obstructed labour. In: Murray CJL and Lopez AD, eds. Health dimensions of sex and reproduction: the global burden of sexually transmitted diseases, maternal conditions, perinatal disorders, and congenital anomalies. WHO,1998. Chhabra S, Gandhi D, Jaiswal M. Obstructed labour – a preventable entity. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;20:151-53.
8. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358:1203-7.
9. Hager RM, Daltviet AK, Hofoss D, Nilson ST, Oian P, Henriksen T. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:428-34.
10. Veisi F, Zangeneh M, Malekkhosravi S, Rezavand N (2012) Comparison of "push" and "pull" methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 118: 4-6.
11. Landesman R, Graber EA (1984) Abdominovaginal delivery: Modification of the cesarean operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 148: 707-710.
12. Patwardhan BD, Motashaw ND. Caesarean Section. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1957;8:1-15.
13. Lippert TH. Abdominovaginal delivery in case of impacted head in cesarean section operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(5):703.
14. Landesman R, Graber EA. Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the cesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148(6):707.
15. Rhadha P, Tagore S, Rahman MFA, Tee J. Maternal and perinatal morbidity after caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation. Singapore Med J. 2012;53:655-8.
16. Mukhopadhyay P, Naskar T, Dalui R, Hazra S, Bhattacharya D. Evaluation of Patwardhan’s technic– a four year study in a rural teaching hospital. Jbstet Gynecol India. 2005;55:244-6.
17. Pradip Kumar Saha et al., Second Stage Caesarean Section: Evaluation of Patwardhan Technique. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(1):93-5. 24. Ajith virkud. Video clip: Patwardhan manoeuvre.
Published
2018-03-20
How to Cite
1.
Lal M, Goyal P, Shamim S. Evaluation of Patwardhan Technique in Second Stage Caesarean Section. IABCR [Internet]. 20Mar.2018 [cited 20Aug.2018];4(1):47-9. Available from: https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/263