A Prospective Study to Assess Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Right Lower Quadrant Pain in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Bareilly
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/8re9sx17Keywords:
Ultrasonography, Specificity, SensitivityAbstract
Background: The study was conducted to assess the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in differentiating causes of acute right lower quadrant pain in women of child-bearing age by taking surgical outcome as the gold standard. Methods: The descriptive analytical study was conducted at Rajshree Medical Institute, Bareilly and comprised female patients of child-bearing age who presented with acute right lower quadrant pain and underwent surgery after ultrasonography. SPSS 10 was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Of the 65 patients enrolled in our study, only 46 patients completed our study, n=34 patients were symptomatically and sonographically positive to have either acutely inflamed non-compressible appendix or focal fluid collection in right lower quadrant with normal pelvic viscera. Sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 81% were calculated.
Conclusions: Ultrasound had a sensitivity and specificity justifying its usage as a good diagnostic tool in emergency situations to avoid undue surgical interventions.
Downloads
References
Groebli Y, Deruaz C, Merlini. M .Outcome of non specific right iliac fossa pain syndromes.Ann Chir. 1998; 52: 959-64.
Jain KA, Ablin DS, Jeffrey RB.Brant . WE. Sonographic differential diagnosis of right lower quadrant pain other than appendicitis Clin Imaging. 1996; 20: 12-6.
Kupesic S, Aksamija A, Vucic N. Ultrasonography in acute pelvic pain. Acta Med Croatica. 2002; 56: 171-80.
Gaensler EH, Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR . Sonography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis: value in establishing alternative diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 152: 49-51.
Bau A, Atri M. Acute female pelvic pain: ultrasound evaluation. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000; 21: 78-93.
Andolsek KM. Ectopic pregnancy: 'classic' vs common presentation J Fam Pract. 1987; 24: 481-5.
Heston Thomas F. "Standardizing predictive values in diagnostic imaging research". J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33: 505-7.
Yitta S, Mausener VE, Kim A. Pelvic ultrasound immediately following MDCT in female patients in abdominal/ pelvic pain: Is it always necessary? Emerg Radiol. 2011; 18: 371-80.
Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 666-9.
Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: Sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology. 1988; 167: 327- 9.
Schulte B, Beyer D, Kaiser C, Horsch S, Wiater A. Ultrasonography in suspected acute appendicitis in childhood - Report of 1285 cases. Eur J Ultrasound 1998; 8: 177-82.
Ramachandran P, Sivit CJ, Newman KD, Scwartz MZ. Ultrasonography as an adjunct in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A four-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 164-7.
Franke C, Böhner H, Yang Q, Ohmann C, Röher HD. Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. World J Surg. 1999; 23: 141-6.
Seal A. Appendicitis: a historical review. Can J Surg. 1981; 24: 427-33.
Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 1986;158: 355-60.
Chan I, Bicknell SG, Graham M. Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting appendicitis in acommunity hospital. Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 1809 -12.
Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Gritzmann N, Daniaux M, Schwamberger K et al. Ovoid shape of the vermiform appendix: a criterion to exclude acuteappendicitis-evaluation with US. Radiology. 2003; 226: 95-100.
Rodriguez DP, Vargas S, Callahan MJ. Appendicitis in young children: Imaging experience and clinical outcomes. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1158-64.
Gisler M, Rouse G, DeLange M. Sonography of appendicitis: A Review. JDMS.1989; 5: 57-60.
Puig S,Hormann M, Rebhandl W, Felder. US as primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendicectomy:six years experience. Radiology. 2003; 226: 101-4.
Lee JH, Jeong YK, Hwang JC. Graded compression sonography with adjuvant use of posterior compression technique in the sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178: 863-8.
Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 666-9.
Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: Sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology. 1988; 167: 327-9.
John H, Neff U, Kelemen M. Appendicitis diagnosis today: Clinical and ultrasonic deductions. World J Surg. 1993; 17: 243-9.
Ali S, Shah STA. Gynaecological Emergencies. Professional Med J. 2007; 14: 43-8.
Shahid G, Dar HM, Majid HJ. A study of gynaecological emergencies presenting as Acute Appendicitis. Proceeding Shaikh Zayed Postgrad Med Inst 2005; 19: 13-7.
Zielke A, Hasse C, Sitter H. Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis:a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1998; 164: 201-9.
Malik KA, Khan A, Waheed I. Evaluation of Alvarado scorein diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2000; 10: 392-4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Archives of BioMedical and Clinical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors are required to sign and submit the completed “Copyright transfer Form” upon acceptance of publication of the paper. This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author and International Archives of Biomedical and Clinical Research. These rights might include the right to publish, communicate and distribute online. Author(s) retain the copyright of their work. International Archives of Biomedical and Clinical Research supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research.
