IABCR Journal Header

Article Viewer

Search

Article QR Code

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

10.21276/iabcr.2017.3.4.18
Extradural Haematoma: Protocol Needs Revision for Conservative Management
Download PDF     Print

October - December 2017 | Vol 3 | Issue 4 | Page : 70-74

Alok Gupta1, Avanish Kumar Saxena2*, Ankur Saxena3, Chandroday Kumar4, Amrita Gupta5

1Associate Professor; 2Professor; 4Post Graduate Resident, Dept. of Surgery; 3Post Graduate resident; 5Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesia & Critical care, S.N Medical College, Agra, UP, India.

How to cite this article: : Gupta A, Saxena AK, Saxena A, Kumar C, Gupta A. Extradural Haematoma: Protocol Needs Revision for Conservative Management. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res. 2017;3(4):70-74.

ABSTRACT

Background: Brain Trauma Foundation recommends EDH volume of greater than 30?cm3 warrants surgical evacuation irrespective of Glasgow Coma Scale. Often it is observed that Not all cases of acute EDH require immediate surgical evacuation, cases with lesser than 5 mm midline shift, no focal neurological deficits and GCS>8 and can be managed conservatively provided the patients are closely observed for any deterioration in GCS. For EDH with a volume more or less than 30ml in the supratentorial space and, a midline shift 6-10 mm, with a GCS score > 10, was attempted non-surgical management, with close observation and serial CT scanning. Aim: The aim of this study was to discover the most important factors influencing the management strategy and outcome of EDH. Methods: 70 adult patients treated for EDH were included in this retrospective study, 26 cases (37%) underwent urgent surgery, 44 cases (62.8%) were managed conservatively out of which one third of patient required delayed surgery. Results: Our study showed that out of 62 % of the patients who were conservatively managed, 72 % had a favorable outcome despite the presence of a midline shift of 6- 10 mm and an EDH volume of >30 ml but having a good GCS score. Conservatively managed patients with GCS >10, 77% had Good Recovery. Those with high EDH volume, 61% had a good outcome. 84 % of the patients having a midline shift between 6-10 mm had a good recovery. Patients with GCS < 8 had a poorer outcome than patients in good neurological status, regardless of the therapy. Conclusions: Hence we conclude, EDH must be promptly diagnosed by CT scan and considered as an emergency lest misdiagnosed and should be admitted into a neurosurgical care unit. Close neurological monitoring, appropriate follow up CT scans in the setting of improved GCS score resulting in good outcome in patient on conservative management

Keywords: Extradural hematoma, brain injury, conservative management.

REFERENCES
  1. Wai Cheong Soon, Hani Marcus Imperial, Mark Wilson. Traumatic acute Extradural haematoma – Indications for surgery revisited: British Journal of Neurosurgery 2016; 30 (2) Pg 233-4
  2. Huisman TA, Tschirch FT. Epidural hematoma in children: Do cranial sutures act as a barrier? J Neuroradiol. 2008.
  3. Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, et al. Surgical management of acute epidural hematomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(Suppl): S7-S1
  4. Greenberg MS. Head trauma. Handbook of Neurosurgery: Thieme; 2006. p. 632-97
  5. David S Liebeskind. Epidural Hematoma Neurology, drugs and disease http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1137065; Apr’ 2014
  6. Chen TY, Wong CW, Chang CN. The expectant treatment of "asymptomatic" supratentorial epidural hematomas. Neurosurgery. 32(2):176-179.
  7. Offner PJ, Pham B, Hawkes A. Non operative management of acute epidural hematomas: a "no-brainer". Am J Surg. 2006 Dec. 192(6):801-5
  8. Petersen O F, Esperson J O. Extradural hematomas: measurement of size by volume summation on CT scanning. Neuroradiology. 1984;26(5):363-7.
  9. Rosario Maugeri, David Greg Anderson Francesca Graziano, Flavia Meccio Massimiliano Visocchi, and Domenico Gerardo Iacopino. Conservative vs. Surgical Management of Post-Traumatic Epidural Hematoma: A Case and Review of Literature. Am J Case Rep. 2015; 16: 811–817
  10. Timmons SD. Extra-axial hematomas. Neurosurgical Emergencies. 2nd ed: Thieme Medical Publishers;2008: 53-67.
  11. Mathur V, Jallo J. Summary and synopsis of the Brain Trauma Foundation head injury guidelines. Neurosurgical Emergencies.2nd ed: Thieme Medical Publishers;2008: 172-194.
  12. Laidlaw J. Extradural hematoma. Operative Neurosurgery London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000:223-31.
  13. Sullivan TP, Jarvik JG, Cohen WA. Follow-up of conservatively managed epidural hematomas: implications for timing of repeat CT. Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:107–13
  14. Offner PJ, Pham B, Hawkes A. Non operative management of acute epidural hematomas: a “no-brainer” Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):801–5
  15. LE, McLaurin RL. Mechanisms of extradural hematomas. J Neurosurg. 1963; 20:760–69.
  16. Knuckey NW, Gelbard S, Epstein MH. The management of “asymptomatic” epidural hematomas. A prospective study. J Neurosurgm. 1989;70:392–96
  17. Zakaria Z, Kaliaperumal C, Kaar G, O'Sullivan M, Marks C Extradural haematoma--to evacuate or not? Revisiting treatment guidelines. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Aug; 115(8):1201-5.
  18. Tuncer R, Kazan S , Ucar T, Acikbas C, Saveren M. Conservative management of epidural haematomas. Prospective study of 15 cases. Acta neurochirurgica.1993; 121(1-2):48-52.
  19. Chen T Y, Wong C W, Chang C N, Lui T N, Cheng W C, Tsai M D, Lin T K. The expectant treatment of "asymptomatic" supratentorial epidural hematomas. Neurosurgery.1993Feb;32(2):176-179
  20. Hamilton M, Wallace C. Non operative management of acute epidural hematoma diagnosed by CT: the neuro radiologist's role. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 1992;13(3):853-9.
  21. Chauvet D1, Reina V, Clarencon F, Bitar A, Cornu P. Conservative management of a large occipital extradural haematoma. Br J Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;27(4):526-8

Published by Ibn Sina Academy of Medieval Medicine & Sciences, registered in 2001 under Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
Publication Manager: Dr. Tayyaba Farhan
Index Copernicus